Home | Attorney Bio | Free Case Review | No Recovery No Fee Guarantee | Results | Contact
     
 

Injuries on Others' Property

This scope of the law involves the other side of the coin so to speak. It is when you have been injured on someone else's property and are making a claim against the property owner or owners. This could be a claim against a retail store, your employer, a government building, or your neighbor.

If You Get Injured in a Store
Suppose you tripped and fell on a spilled can of paint in a hardware store where you were shopping, injuring your foot. Can you recover damages from the store? It depends on the facts of the case. Storeowners must keep their premises reasonably safe for customers, inspecting and discovering any dangerous conditions. They also must keep all aisles clear and properly maintained. A judge or jury will look at whether the owner was aware that the paint can was in the aisle and how long it had been there. But a judge or jury also might find that you discovered the spilled paint and proceeded to walk right through it. Then the judge or jury might deny you damage or find you're comparatively at fault, thus reducing your recovery.

What if I get injured while at the home of my neighbor, who invited me there for a party?
As a social guest, you might be able to recover from your neighbor, depending on how your injuries happened. Homeowners must tell their guests about--or make safe--any dangerous conditions that the guests are unlikely to recognize. Suppose, for example, that your injury was caused when you tripped on a throw rug. You may be able to recover if you can prove that your neighbor knew other people had tripped over it and you were unlikely to realize its danger. Your neighbor probably should have warned you about it, removed it during the party, or secured it to the floor with tape or tacks.

I was walking on a public sidewalk next to a construction site when I tripped and fell on a brick from the site, spraining my ankle. May I recover damages from the construction company?
In some circumstances, you will be able to recover damages from the construction company, which has a duty to take reasonable steps to keep sidewalks near its construction sites free from bricks and other debris. If the company fails to remove such obstructions and you trip and fall, the company may be liable for your injuries. Construction companies should tell pedestrians that they could get injured if they stray from the sidewalk. But posting a sign is not enough. If a company fails to place barriers or warning lamps by a building pit, for example, it may be responsible if anyone falls into it and gets injured.

I fell on a broken piece of a city sidewalk and injured my ankle. Do I have a case against the city?
In many states, municipal immunity statutes prohibit recovery in many kinds of cases against a city or town. If there is not such a statute or ordinance, however, you may have a case. Municipalities have a duty to keep streets and sidewalks in repair. You might have a successful case against the city if you can show that it failed to maintain the sidewalk properly.

My son received an injury during basic training in the U.S. Army. May he recover damages from the federal government?
No. People in the armed services who receive injuries during the course of their duties are not permitted to recover for their injuries. But the Federal Tort Claims Act of 1946 waives U.S. immunity for a "negligent or wrongful act or omission." So it would permit, under certain conditions, recovery in personal injury lawsuits against the United States government for torts committed by its employees. These actions are brought in the U.S. Claims Court (see the "How the Legal System Works" chapter). Some states have their own courts of claim. In other states, claims actions can be brought through other courts.

My son and his friends went snowmobiling on a nearby farm. When the vehicle ran into a fence, one of them got hurt. The farmer now says he is not liable. Is that true?
If landowners know that others are using their land for snowmobiling, most states say they must warn snowmobiles about hidden dangerous conditions or remove them. Was the fence visible? Did the farmer recently build it? A few states, such as Michigan, have laws specifically dealing with liability when someone uses property for recreational purposes without permission. In those states, the farmer probably would not be liable if he did not authorize the boys to be on his land and did not act recklessly. You might want to ask a lawyer about your state's law.

I got injured on a ski lift. May I recover against the ski resort?
Possibly. Can you prove that the resort was negligent? Remember that some states have laws limiting the liability of resorts, saying there are certain risks that a person assumes when skiing. However, some states hold that ski lifts are common carriers, like buses. They have higher duties than others, so in one of these states you might have an excellent case.

Liability at Sporting Events
Suppose you went to a baseball game, and a ball that a player hit into the stands injured you. What can you do? Spectators at a baseball game know they may be injured by a flying ball. That is why courts generally say that spectators assume the risk of being hurt by a ball. The same usually holds true if a golf ball hits you while you are watching a golf match. Likewise, if a wheel from a car in an automobile race flies into the stands, you assume the risk of getting hurt. The legal term for this doctrine is assumption of the risk. It means that you agreed to face a known danger. But if there is a hole in a screen intended to protect spectators at the baseball park, you then probably could argue that it was negligence not to have it repaired.

My daughter, who plays on the local park's basketball team, brought home a note asking us to sign a form saying we won't hold the park district responsible for injuries. What is that?
You are talking about a so-called waiver of liability that is intended to contractually release the organization of any liability should an injury occur. Your signature doesn't necessarily mean that you've signed away all of your rights. If you must either sign such a form or deprive your child of the chance to participate in the activity, a court may hold that your waiver is not really voluntary and thus not valid. And even in those states that recognize waivers, the waiver might not mean that you are giving up your right to sue entirely. If an injury results because of intentional or reckless behavior, you probably will be able to seek damages.

I was staying at a motel when there was a fire, but there was no water sprinkler system and no escape route posted in the room. Doesn't the hotel have to have those safety precautions?
The motel management probably should have exercised reasonable care about the fire alarms and fire escapes. And they should have helped you escape. As in the case of the common carrier above, the law generally says that innkeepers, who have a special relationship with their guests, have a higher duty of care.

Someone attacked my daughter on the campus of the college she attends. May she hold the school responsible for this attack?
Your daughter might have a negligence action against the college. In a developing area of law known as premises liability, courts have found such entities as universities, motels, convenience stores and shopping malls liable for attacks because they did not exercise reasonable care in preventing victims from being harmed by a third person. In a case that drew headlines in the 1970s, for example, a court awarded $2.5 million to singer Connie Francis for an attack at a Howard Johnson's Motor Lodge. The court found that the motel did not take proper and reasonable steps to prevent the attack. In general, a hotel must provide adequate security and not permit people to loiter. In your daughter's case, a court would look at the facts and ask whether similar attacks had occurred previously in the same area. If so, the court would ask what security precautions the college had taken.

I was attacked after withdrawing money from an automated teller machine (ATM). What can I do?
Under the tort theory of premise liability, discussed above, customers have sued banks for failing to protect them from assault at ATMs. While there used to be no common law duty to provide security against such crimes, a duty has been recognized in recent years. In such a case, a judge or jury would determine if there were past occurrences and if a likelihood of a crime was foreseeable. If so, they may hold that the bank had a duty to protect people using that machine and that the bank was liable.

Is there anything else victims may do?
Yes. Most states have laws compensating victims of violent crimes for lost wages, counseling, and medical expenses. There also are several victim assistance programs. Check with your local prosecutor's office (possibly called the office of the state's attorney or district attorney).

If You Get Injured at Work
Workers' compensation laws, currently in place in all fifty states and the District of Columbia, cover most workers injured on the job. Under these laws, employers compensate you for your injuries, including medical expenses, lost wages (temporary disability) and permanent or temporary disability, regardless of who was at fault. All you have to do is file notice with your employer and a claim with the state's worker's compensation commission, or board. (See the chapter on "Law in the Workplace" for more details.)

Legislatures created the laws because they thought that liability for workplace accidents should be placed on the one most able to bear the loss--the employer. The statutes fall under strict liability principles, discussed below, so no employer or employee negligence or fault need be shown. In fact, the statutes prohibit employees from filing tort claims against their employers for conditions covered by the law. Instead, an employee gets paid according to a fixed schedule of benefits, regardless of who was at fault.

It is extremely rare that an employee is not covered by such a law, but if you are not, you may be able to recover from your employer on a negligence claim. To do so, you must show that your employer failed to exercise reasonable care in providing you with safe working conditions or that your employer failed to warn you of unsafe conditions that you were unlikely to discover. Other possible suits against your employer might include an action alleging an intentional injury or an intentional disregard of your safety. Or your spouse might sue for loss of consortium. (See the "Family Law" chapter for more details.)

I think my colleagues' smoking at work is making me sick. Since I'm a non-smoker, do I have any recourse?
In a growing area of interest, a recent Environmental Protection Agency report has linked "passive" tobacco smoke to lung cancer and other ailments. Some non-smokers have filed workers' compensation claims saying they became ill in a smoke-filled workplace. Damage suits also have been filed against the employers, for allowing smoking, and directly against tobacco companies. The non-smoker would have to show that the presence of smoke caused his or her illness.

 
     

:: Club Owners Indicted

:: Personal Injury Law
Personal Injury Index
Tort Law Theory
Auto Accident Claims
Slip and Fall Claims
Emotional Distress
Medical Malpractice
Professional Malpractice
Defective Product Claims
Sexual Harassment
HMO Liability Claims
Toxic Mold
Nursing Home Abuse

© 2004 Bostwick and Janoff, Attorneys at Law. Bostwick and Janoff is a Professional Corporation of California.
Home | Terms | Privacy | Links | Sitemap | Contact